|
photography
---------------------
---------------------
A Greek forum
my gallery on bankit
| |
| Θέμα: Some Thougths on “MACEDONIAN” Security. |
| |
Συντάκτης: Χριστόφορος Κουτίτας, Καθηγητής ΑΠΘ |
| |
Ημερομηνία καταχώρησης: 4η Απριλίου 2008 |
 |
Let us start from easily understandable facts
1. The dogma of “Pan-Slavism” and the attempt to reach the Aegean Sea, bypassing
the Dardanelles, as formulated by Russia in 1870, enforced directly on the
region of Macedonia by Bulgaria around 1900 and indirectly by Tito’s Yugoslavia
after 1945, is taking a new form of expression nowadays.
2. The inhabitants of FYROM are not descendants of the Macedonians of the
classical ages (a well known part of the Greek race) but are mostly Slavs and
Albanians. As admirers of a glorious past and assuming they are happy to disdain
the local ancient race of the “Dardans”, they can at most call themselves “New
Macedonians”.
3. They live in an area a small part of which constituted the northern (or upper)
section of the geographical region – or administrative region during the
Byzantine and Ottoman eras – historically known as Macedonia, which in its
entirety included today’s established and EU-recognised Greek Regions of Central
Macedonia, West Macedonia and East Macedonia. Thus their land may justly claim
the geographical definition of “Upper Macedonia”, if not “Vardarska”, a name
used for a long time before Tito.
4. Many Slavo-Macedonians of FYROM, who in fact speak a dialect of Bulgarian,
have already obtained Bulgarian passports, an indication of their national
affinity.
5. The intrinsic instability of FYROM is not due to the absence of recognition
by Greece but a) to its effort to achieve artificial coherence as a state
through aggressive nationalistic visions and b) to Albanian separatism, which is
externally incited and controlled.
6. If the inhabitants of FYROM do not deserve the humiliation of changing their
name, neither do the inhabitants of Greece deserve the worse humiliation of
accepting the insult of the donation of their historic name to usurpers and,
even worse, of coexisting within the Alliance with a co-member with the official
aggressive propaganda of FYROM (“liberation of Thessaloniki from the Greek
occupation” or similar rubbish).
Security is an internationally important issue that emerged after “9/11”. That
shocking event proved that it is better to prevent than repair.
The current issue of the alleged “Republic of Macedonia” sooner or later will
take its old form, i.e., the Slavs will demand to have access to the Aegean Sea
through a virtual “Macedonian” nation. The issue may well take a subsequent form
of security disturbances inside N. Greece.
In order to avert such disturbances, or any external pressures to rearrange
boundaries or for regional reorganization, in a Machiavellian situation of
“CRISIS GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT”, Greece has to take now a firm position and
insist that the only acceptable solution for the naming of FYROM is either an
ethnological characterization of “New Macedonia” or a geographical
characterization of “North or Upper Macedonia”. This is the correct policy of
the Greek Government today, in contrast to that towards Tito in the ‘40s. Such a
policy will lead to the diffusion of both ideologies destabilizing the Balkans,
i.e. that of a “Great Macedonia” and that of a “Great Albania”. The
aforementioned pressures may originate from various directions as long as this
issue remains open and exploitable by various parties according to their
incidental interests and endeavors.
As far as the international community is concerned, a large majority, saturated
since 1946 by the systematic propaganda of Tito’s “historians” and “fraud map”
designers, are either bored by our delayed complaints or are cunningly joining
the “diversive harassment” against us, orchestrated now by our eastern neighbor.
Any form of destabilization of FYROM will automatically create transient
regional chaos, exploitable by Albanian expansionism to a degree beyond that
permissible (or controllable) by their protectors. This is a development which
may effectively diffuse the issue of the virtual “Macedonian nation” and expose
Albanian expansionism internationally. Nevertheless, the international community
must indeed assist in averting that destabilization. But not at the cost of
upsetting the present or future stability of Greece.
The modeling of long term international evolution is not as simple as computers
may suggest, while it is historically proven fact
a) that a nation or a state, greater or smaller, like any living organism, with
an inherent organizational-administrative-economic weakness or racial
degeneration (of educational-health-demographic nature), will sooner or later
feel the fatal disruptive influence of any minor factor and
b) that “Hybris” of any form is governed by Godly laws that regulate the
evolution of all systems.
Let us remain persistent, firm, moderate and most of all “healthy”!!!
http://www.diktyo21.gr/item.asp?ReportID=631
| |
Macedonia
--------------
about
F.Y.R.O.M. disruption
Truth about Skopje
FYROM
sources
τα Σκόπια δεν έχουν αθώα
κίνητρα!
Κριτική Χρήστου Γιανναρά.
about
ancient Macedonia
Ancient and medieval Macedonia
more
facts and truth about Macedonia
Themis
Macedonia
Macedonian security
the
Skopje affair
http://www.greekalert.com
|
